Re Romance conlangs (erat Re: Newbie says hi)
|From:||Mat McVeagh <matmcv@...>|
|Date:||Saturday, November 2, 2002, 10:03|
>From: Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...>
Thanks Jan, I've joined that. Wow, there really are too many conlangs and
even conlang groups, I can see I'm not going to get to the bottom of them
Internet access plans that fit your lifestyle -- join MSN.
> > I wonder what a Germanic development of Vulgar Latin would be like. Or a
> > Romance development of Germanic?
>I don't know about any efforts towards the latter; I doubt whether someone
>ever tried. For some reason the Romance conlangs have always vastly
>their Germanic counterparts.
>However, I do know about the existence of two Romance conlangs with a
>development: Germanech (by Jörg Rhiemeyer) and Jelbäzech (by Dan Jones).
>Now I think that Dan (who could well be nicknamed as "The Romlang Machine")
>could very well have done some more efforts in the direction, but I've not
>any results of that.
>Check this list's archives for Germanech; you will find quite a lot.
>For Jelbäzech (from "Helvetica") you probably need to search the archives
>another group, RomanceConlang (you might need to subscribe first). Anyway,
>can find it at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/romanceconlang.