| From: | F. Murat Oezcan <tara@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Friday, April 12, 2002, 8:00 |
well, the reason why i think Ro is a bitter than most other languages is the fact that the vocabulary is in fact mapping of concepts. the computer program which i am planning is not supposed to communicate with the user using Ro, but merely map the concepts for it in form of Ro-words (if you plan to use neuronal networks, you have to develop such a mapping anyways, instead of having it completely symbolic, using an already existing one would help a lot-- at least during the development) pity that the link you mentioned was already the one which attracted me to the topic, but there seems to be no further information- nor the mentioned books actually, being as old as they are, went simply out of print. On 12 Apr 2002, at 6:36, Jan van Steenbergen wrote:> --- "F. Murat Oezcan" <tara@...> wrote: > > > dear all, > > > > i am currently developing a software which would > > need a language in order to communicate with the > > user. to this purpose the language Ro seemed to be a > > > very good choice ... > > The only link I could find is this one: > http://www.langmaker.com/outpost/ro.htm > > Software that communicates with the user in Ro? Are > you sure your program is going to be user-friendly? > > Jan > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > http://uk.my.yahoo.com