|From:||Muke Tever <alrivera@...>|
|Date:||Friday, January 14, 2000, 2:45|
Can anyone here think of a reason for a language to develop a kind of
non-phonetic alphabet--that is, one having no relation whatever to the way
it is spoken?
The only ways I can think of it might occur are
- pictograms (not actually alphabetic, but...)
- a kind of extreme borrowing (the written language borrowed entirely from
an other, preferably unrelated language).
So, perhaps a revision to the question: Can anyone think up another way of
writing that doesn't refer to the following?
1) the sounds spoken in the language [for <sat>, read "sat"]
2) [possibly stylized] visual representation [for a picture of an apple,
3) words as spoken/written in another language [for <e.g.>, read "for