Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Nasal semivowels/fricatives?

From:Thomas R. Wier <artabanos@...>
Date:Friday, February 18, 2000, 18:27
Ed Heil wrote:

> > Could Christophes nasal stops possibly be ejective > > (or otherwise glottalic) > > nasals? When I pronounce these, they seem to be > > both a stop and a nasal.
Well, "nasals" are actually just stops where air is allowed to flow through the nasal cavity.
> I think we may have discussed this before. I was of > the opinion that an ejective nasal was very unlikely > because, well, I didn't put it this way, but it adds > up to: nasals tend to be voiced, because unvoiced > nasals are comparatively difficult to hear (though not > so difficult that they don't exist in some languages, > but they're marked), and ejectives are virtually > always unvoiced*.
Well, granted, voiceless sounds have lower sonority than do voiced sounds, but there's nothing deterministic about that fact: plenty of languages have voiceless sounds. How does Japanese perpetuate its voiceless vowels if they're as "hard to hear" as they are?
> Unvoiced nasals usually only exist when voiced > counterparts also exist; however, there could not* be > a voiced counterpart to an ejective nasal; hence it > would be very awkward in terms of markedness for a > language to have an ejective nasal. It would be > difficult to hear, and there would be no counterpart > which is easier to hear. > > That said, they exist. They're just very very very > rare. :)
Eh? Thai and some other languages in South-East Asia have them. I don't think they're as rare as, say, the so-called voiced aspirates (there are exactly 6 such languages documented in the world today, five of which are descendents of Sanskrit).
> * I understand that voiced ejectives are said to in > fact exist, but as I understand ejectives that would > be a contradiction in terms -- the necessary glottis > settings for ejectives and voice are not compatible. > If somebody can explain to me what a "voiced ejective" > is like, phonetically, I'd love to hear it...
As far as I know, no language has voiced ejectives, but the reverse is not true: there are languages that have voiceless implosives. Mam, a Mayan language, allophonically devoices the voiced bilabial implosive under certain phonetic conditions, for example (the nature of which escape me at the moment). ====================================== Tom Wier <artabanos@...> ICQ#: 4315704 AIM: trwier "Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero." ======================================