Re: THEORY: Tone marking (Was Re: THEORY: Mandarin vowel phonology)

At 10:40 AM 10/13/99 +0200, you wrote:
>Paul Bennett wrote:
>>
>> Despite the (non-canonical) sources I've seen to the contrary, this seems
like a
>> likely way for the Bajoran (or Old Bajoran?) scripts to work.  Does
anyone have
>> any canon(-ish) sources for Trek langs other than tlhIngan Hol, by the way?
>>
>
>        The only URL I have at hand is:
>
>http://www.dallas.net/~cpinette/startrek/index.html
>
>        It is the only URL I've seen which talks about the Bajoran language,
>but there's not much in it (maybe because it takes only the canonical
>sources). But I'm interested also in sources about the canonical Trek
>langs other than Klingon.
>
There's a Vulcan Language Institute at

http://www.teleport.com/~vli

This is _not_ the Zvelebil's Vulcan language, but claims to base its
grammar and vocabulary only on canon sources.

-- Terry