Re: OT: agnosticism

Nik Taylor scripsit:
> John Cowan wrote:
> > It would be an interesting corpus project to see if "PERSON that"
> > is actually less frequent than "PERSON who", relative to the
> > frequencies of "THING that" vs. "THING who".
>
> "Thing who" isn't even grammatical, is it?
Erp, yes.  *assumes paper bag*

I meant, of course, "THING which".

--
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
        --Douglas Hofstadter