Julia "Schnecki" Simon skrev:
> Hmm... Since I'd be happiest with a one-grapheme-per-phoneme system,
> I've decided to adopt the proposed consonant romanization with a few
> changes:
>
> /p_h/ f /p_>/ p /b/ b /w/ w
> /t_h/ s /t_>/ t /d/ d /r\/ r
> /c_h/ h /c_>/ c /J\/ z /j/ j
> /k_h/ x /k_>/ k /g/ g /M\/ q
>
> /L/ l, /N/ n
Great! How come I didn't think of using voiceless fricative
letters for the aspirates? Obviously I'm not as daring a
romanizer as I like to think! ;) For one thing I would have
mapped |h| and |x| the other way around (in view of Pinyin
and Portuguese*), but |h| for a palatal is great -- after all
it *is* an upside-down Cyrillic |tS|! :)
*) Also in view of <http://ib.frath.net/w/Xrirampur_Romanization>
of which I'm originally guilty.
--
/BP 8^)>
--
Benct Philip Jonsson -- melroch at melroch dot se
Solitudinem faciunt pacem appellant!
(Tacitus)