Re: S-Haceks (was: Re: stop it. )

On Sat, 15 Jan 2000 17:37:55 +0100 Raymond Brown <ray.brown@...>
writes:
> >-Stephen (Steg)
> > "amô, ê amo.  amâmu, ê nô maçtâmû."
> Ooh!  Steg's conlang now looks a lot neater than I've ever seen it
> before.
> So what I see as Steg's Ù comes out as ö on other systems and what
> I've
> heretofor seen as Í is now ê, and his strange {maÁt’mš} might
> actually be simply {maçtâmû}.
> I wonder what will happen to all the diacritics when this email gets
> read
> elsewhere.
>
> Ray.
.

Well, i seem to have gotten it back okay...or at least the way i assume
you're seeing it.
My sig that time was supposed to be "amo, e amo.  amamu, e no mactamu.",
where the O in the first "amo" and in "no" has a circumflex, both the Es
had also, the middle A in "amamu", and the last two vowels (A and U) in
"mactamu" also had circumflexes, and the C had a cedilla.

-Stephen (Steg)
 "amô, ê amo.  amâmu, ê nô maçtâmû."

(which, btw, means "i love, and am loved.  we are loved, and we do not
kill." in so-far judajca)