Re: THEORY: Storage Vs. Computation
From: | John Cowan <cowan@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, June 15, 1999, 20:38 |
Peter Morwood & Diane Duane wrote:
> I've definitely been away from NY too long. :) Would you care to talk a
> little about what this is?
Well, it's a systematic change in certain vowels. For example,
"Ann" is pronounced the way "Ian" used to be pronounced.
>
> >...we also have "dove",
>
> Still present here as a "fossilized" form. Very country.
Actually it's an innovation.
> >..."shat",...
>
> We have this one too, though it's rare. I heard it in Dublin recently,
> though, which surprised me a little. Possibly a back-formation...?
No, analogy. sit-sat, shit-shat. But the original verb was
shite-shit-shitten, like bite; I believe in Ireland "shite" is
still current? (My father, born in an Irish enclave in Philadelphia
in 1904, used it regularly).
> >... and (according
> >to And) "twug" = "realized, comprehended".
>
> I would have thought "to twig" was a very UKish construction. Are two of
> the Great Englishes drawing sneakily closer together, then? ;)
"And" = And Rosta, a conlangist who lives in the U.K.
As far as I know, "twig" is not normally used in this sense in the
U.S., which is why I glossed it.
BTW, if you are *the* Diane Duane, Romulan is an impressive conlang!
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)