Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?

From:Yoon Ha Lee <yl112@...>
Date:Sunday, January 28, 2001, 15:29
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, E-Ching Ng wrote:

> Imperative wrote: > >Why is it that /p/ and devoiced /b/ sound slightly different? I recall > >reading somewhere that it has something to do with fortis and lenis > >voiceless (or I could be mistaken?) > > We should ask Yoon Ha. Korean has a three way contrast between voiceless > stops: aspirated, unaspirated, and fortis. Is the devoiced /b/ the fortis > stop?
Let's see...that would be (in transliteration) p' t' ch' k' (aspirated, and no, the transliteration isn't my fault) p t ch k (unaspirated) (note: the Korean gov't changed these to b, d, ch, g before vowels) pp tt ? kk (fortis or "tensed") Devoiced /b/ the fortis stop? Not s'far as I can tell. 'Course, I'm fuzzy on how a devoiced /b/ would be different from /p/. I do know that [b], [d], [g] seem to be allophonic or becoming allophonic with the unaspirated stops when they occur before vowels.
> The three Korean grad students in my phonetics class told us that fortis > stops were produced by stiffening the vocalis folds so that there was no > vibration in the larynx. This made things as clear as mud to me. There > were slightly audible differences between individual unaspirated and fortis > pairs which they produced for us, but I could never generalise the > difference and recognise what made them different.
<blink> It's crystal-clear to me, but then Korean was my first language. I do know that the one that seems to give English-speakers the most trouble as far as distinguishing them from hearing are "ss" (which Hebrew-speakers seem to hear as [ts]? though the tongue tip doesn't actually touch anything, it just comes really close; and for my money, "ss" is closest to English [s]) and "s". Their explanation is probably better than mine, which up to now has been, "listen to what I say and then try to make the sound tense in your throat." Since "ss" is a fricative it doesn't seem to belong in the same category anyway (though its representation in the Korean alphabet is parallel). :-/ YHL