Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: CHAT: Unsolicited abuse

From:Joshua Shinavier <ajshinav@...>
Date:Monday, May 10, 1999, 11:15
James Campbell wrote:
> Interestingly, I've just received some hate-mail for Jameld. Some wiseacr=
e
> from Canada just wanted to tell me that "the whole thing is stupid, just > like its creator." >=20 > Oh well, in that case I'd better give up my lifelong hobby right away, if > it's *stupid*. >=20 > Beats me why they were looking at my website in the first place: after al=
l,
> the only links to it are from conlang directories, AFAIK. Needless to say=
, I
> hit DEL.
Well, the one common factor of all hate mail is that the sender has some personal reason for sending it; generally it's far more relevant to the emotional state of the person writing it than whatever it is he's writing a= bout. Hmm, whether conlanging is "stupid"? Stupid, as opposed to more sensible activities like, say, watching people run up and down a field trying to kic= k a ball into a net? Drinking beer and swapping blonde jokes? These would be = more ordinary and therefore less risky as far as popular opinion goes; "going wi= th the flow" has the obvious advantage that it minimizes the amount of critici= sm you will receive. But there's also one really annoying thing about going w= ith the flow, and that's that so many other people have already gone with it --= the flow, one feels, is lacking in originality to much the same degree as the surface of the sun is lacking in iced beverages. It seldom produces anythi= ng new or valuable. And conlanging can be more purposeful than most people, including many conlangers, would at first suppose; creating your own langua= ge gives you the freedom to analyze the world you live in in a completely "cle= an" and self-defined way. and then Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> I think that's something that happens to us all at some time - I remember > I was chatting in a second-hand bookstore with the owner about conlangs > when someone came along and started argue that since my languages > couldn't be used for communcation, and the purpose of language is > communication, what I did wasn't inventing languages, and that I was > non compos for engaging in so silly a waste of time.
But that's not the only purpose, nor even a major consideration of most conlangers. And even if it were, who cares? At the very worst it's a fun waste of time like any other hobby. At best it provides you with a novel w= ay of looking at the world which I for one have found extremely useful, both philosophically and practically. Josh _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ Joshua Shinavier =20 _/ _/ _/ Loorenstrasse 74, Zimmer B321=20 _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ CH-8053 Z=FCrich =20 _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Switzerland =20 _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ http://www.delphi.com/aring Danov=EBn pages: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Crete/5555/ven.htm