Re: [4:] ~ [r]
| From: | Muke Tever <hotblack@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Sunday, September 12, 2004, 16:49 |
|---|
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:43:53 -0400, Trebor Jung <treborjung@...> wrote:
> Since [4] is a tap, and [r] is a trill, wouldn't [4:] be essentially the
> same as [r]? Or is there a difference?
They might possibly be the same... but given the punctual nature of a tap, I'm not
sure if [4:] could really be said to mean anything (though /4:/ might--and I
wouldnt be surprised to find [r] there).
*Muke!
--
website: http://frath.net/
LiveJournal: http://kohath.livejournal.com/
deviantArt: http://kohath.deviantart.com/
FrathWiki, a conlang and conculture wiki:
http://wiki.frath.net/
Reply