From: | Andy Smith <andybrucesmith@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Saturday, July 19, 2003, 12:43 |
Hi Harald,>The terminology of the document seems quite unusual to me as well butI'm sorry about the terminology. I confess that I am a bit concerned that some of the traditional terms may smuggle in unwanted baggage -- but even so, I'd love to replace the 'orders' and 'positions' and the other odd words with more familiar ones if anyone can suggest some alternatives. -Andy