Re: A weird answer (was: a weird question...)
From: | From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <lassailly@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, September 21, 1999, 20:01 |
Dans un courrier dat=E9 du 20/09/99 12:07:40 , Andrew a =E9crit :
> > The Queen's English was
> > Good enough for Jesus Christ
> > And it's good enough for me." (x2)
"look up ahead" and this comes true.
has anybody disserted as to why ?
my humble experience is that i spent 6 whole, long years training
how to gibber german, 10 years to finally mock japanese and only
3 months to successfully express in english - speaking it takes a few
more years and fine encounters though ;-) - as if it were conjuring up
a kind of "universal" grammar.
the problem with english is that vocabulary is like the danaid's pierced=20
barrel : exhausting and never exhausted. don't other non-native speakers fee=
l=20
so ?
mathias
(btw indonesian is only a few days' case - but who cares anyway)