Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Another question: genders

From:The Gray Wizard <dbell@...>
Date:Thursday, August 10, 2000, 10:26
epicene

David

> -----Original Message----- > From: Constructed Languages List [mailto:CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU]On > Behalf Of H. S. Teoh > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 9:44 PM > To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU > Subject: Another question: genders > > > I've another question about terminology, if people don't mind... this time > it's about genders. :-) > > Besides having a nullar number, the conlang I'm working on also has two > genders in addition to the regular masculine, feminine, and neuter. > > One is what I'm tentatively calling "ambivalent", which indicates the noun > is both masculine and feminine (simultaneously). Well, I guess I should > say that gender in the language *is* directly linked to the actual sex of > the noun, not just an arbitrary categorization (like inanimate or abstract > nouns in Greek). Neuter is used for most inanimate nouns, while masculine > and feminine are strictly used only for persons/beings that have gender. > The ambivalent gender appears in words that refer to married couples, as > well as in unusual nouns. > > The other special gender is tentatively called, for the lack of a better > term, the "ambiguous" gender. It only appears in nouns referring to things > that actually have gender (e.g., people). A noun in the "ambiguous" gender > indicates one of the following things: (1) the speaker doesn't know the > gender of the person(s)/thing(s) referred to yet, and doesn't want to > presume anything (the culture is very sensitive to that); (2) the speaker > is referring to a collective group of mixed genders (yes, the culture is > very picky about things like this); or, (3) the speaker does not want to > narrow his statements to one gender (did I say the culture is very > sensitive to things like this? :-) > > In a nutshell, the "ambiguous" gender serves as a kind of "wildcard" that > can "become" either masculine and feminine (but not neuter) as needed. > > Any comments/suggestions? "ambivalent" sounds OK to me, but "ambiguous" > seems somewhat awkward. (It does happen to sound like "ambivalent", that's > why I chose it in the first place.) I've seen a related word somewhere > that uses omni- but I forgot the exact word. (omniline? ominine? anybody > knows?) > > Thanks! > > > T >