Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: anti-Sanskritism and more

From:Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
Date:Monday, December 1, 2003, 17:12
Quoting Mike Ellis <nihilsum@...>:

> (note: listserv site went haywire within forty seconds of my attempt to post > this. Multiple postings are S.E.F.P. No apologies.) > > >*skims* > >There are facts there, hidden behind the groutesque propaganda viewpoint. > > The best of those pages is > http://www.dalitstan.org/books/a_sans/a_sans3.html > > Some gems: > > "while Proto-Germanic had 6 cases, Modern German only has 4 and modern > Hindustani only 2. The most archaic language, Proto-Indo-European, had 8 > cases. Sanskrit, which also has 8 cases, is thus a member of the most > primitive language class in the world." > > "A complex grammar is never an indicator of the richness of a language, > rather a cumbersome grammar indicates a less evolved state." > > "the Bushmen languages have a highly complex grammar involving `click' > sounds, but nobody except Bushmen claim that these languages are very rich"
To go off a tangent, I've been told that the Khoisan languages on the contrary have quite simple grammars - I've even seen them cited as support for a more or less sane hypothesis that languages with complex morphology have simple phonologies and vice versa. Who's right? Andreas

Reply

Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>