Re: Translation pattern of `to have'?

> >
> > I know the following:
> >     Some langs have a special verb `to have':
> >         E:  I have a car.
> >         SV: Jag har en bil.
> >         NL: Ik heb een auto.
> >         DT: Ich habe ein Auto.
> >         F:  J'ai une voiture.
> >
> >     This verb is not restricted to IE languages:
> >         MC: Wo3 you3 che1.
> >
> >     Many languages do not use `to have':
> >         FIN: Minulla on auto.
> >         RU:  U minya yest' avtomobil'.
Note on the Russian. Normally you won't use /yest'/ "to be; is; etc." so
it would be like, "u menya avtomobil". Also, though it is archaic and not
used, Russian has a verb "to have", /imat'/ - which is used in other
slavic languages eg Slovak: (Ja) mam auto; Serbian: (Ja) imam auto.

Hungarian is interesting in regards to expressing possession. One can say,
most commonly,

Van egy auto'm = Is one car-1p possesive marker

this can also be said as:

Auto'm van = car-1pPos is

which stresses more that it is a car that I have.

And one can also use the verb "birtokol"

Birtokolok egy autot = I possess (subjective)  a car

but this sounds very forced and unnatural, though it is grammatically
correct. If you want to take it further down that path, you can say

Birtokolom az automat = I possess (objective) the car-1pPos-ACCUSATIVE

-------ferko
Ferenc Gy. Valoczy

railways page: http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/3976/
25kV 50Hz: http://www.mp3.com/25kV50Hz

Reply