Re: A Pictographic system that makes fonts obsolete
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Friday, December 12, 2003, 2:19 |
En réponse à Gary Shannon :
>Thanks for the ideas. I'll have a look. Is the source
>code for METAFONT available?
Not only it is freely available, but I have it somewhere among my files :))
(need to check where :))) ). If you want to check it out, I suggest you
brush up on your Pascal. Like TeX, whose source is also freely available,
it's written in that language :)) . If you want, I can send it to you as
soon as I find it :)) .
> I've had a look at the
>TrueType documentation and it seems to have a lot more
>power than I need for simple glyphs.
That's because a font has to handle things like accents, kerning (putting
letters closer or further away so that they *look* at equal distance from
each other), ligatures, etc... Those things need some power to be handled
correctly :)) .
Fonts are fun to learn about. They are quite a complex, but engaging
subject (typography is a great art-craft to learn about - which makes me
think that I still didn't write this post about my comparison between
typography and conlanging, two arts which have a lot in common -)
> It might be fun
>to write a word processor that works with my
>pictographs and uses this method of drawing the
>glyphs.
Since you'd basically need to write an interpreter to read glyph source
files, you could actually write something which would be
software-independent (since it seems it's the road IMEs are taking. You
would write a kind of IME basically), which would output something common
enough (maybe an image in some format) in the clipboard, so that you can
use that in any word processor you want. The future is in
language-independent software and internationalisation tools :)) .
Christophe Grandsire.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.