Re: unknown symbols

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Gary Shannon <fiziwig@...> wrote:
> There's always the possibility they were put there as a resource for conlangers who
> want variety in their alphabets. ;-)
:)  The existence of precomposed characters that are equivalent to
combinations of other existing characters often implies the
precomposed version exists in some character set that has round-trip
compatibility with Unicode.  But in such cases the Unicode character
database lists those character sets, and the characters above don't
list any, so I'm at a loss.


--
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>