Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: OT: "Tracheal" consonants: a curiosity?

From:Paul Roser <pkroser@...>
Date:Monday, June 6, 2005, 18:57
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:53:04 -0400, # 1 <salut_vous_autre@...> wrote:

>>As to which languages use epiglottals - they have been reported to >>occur in Arabic, Salishan languages, Nootka, Somali, some Caucasian >>languages, Dahalo (East Africa), Amis (Taiwan) - in fact many >>instances previously reported as pharyngeals may in fact be realized >>at least allophonically as epiglottals. >> > >Are there oppositions between pharyngal and epiglottal consonants? > >Or pharyngal, glottal, and epiglottal consonants?
Allegedly some dialects of the Caucasian language Agul contrast pharyngeal and epiglottal (and perhaps glottal). Certainly a glottal/epiglottal contrast would be possible, since it is a variant of glottal/pharyngeal.
> >>Epiglottalized vowels (as opposed to true epiglottal segments) have >>also been reported in Ju|hoansi & !Xoo (both Khoesan) as well as >>in Bai (Tibeto-Burman), and probably others that I can't recall off >>the top of my head. >> > >Isn't an epiglottalized vowels the same as a creaky voiced vowel? if not >does it sound similar and is there a X-Sampa symbol?
They are nothing alike - creaky voiced (or glottalized) vowels contrast with epiglottalized vowels in several Khoesan languages, and I don't think they sound similar at all. There is no X-Sampa symbol for epiglottalized that I am aware of, though you could use a raised epiglottal (stop or fricative?) which is what I've seen in the IPA literature, so maybe _?\ would serve. Bfowol

Replies

Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>
Joseph Bridwell <darkmoonman@...>