Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be"

Roger Mills wrote at 2005-05-15 01:00:10 (-0400)
 > Tim May wrote:
 > >
 > > (This is one of several papers recently removed from his web page (I
 > > think they're finally being published) but which can still be accessed
 > > from the copy at the Internet Archive:
 >
http://web.archive.org/web/20040508005935/http://www.linguistics.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/~himmelmann/publications.html
 >
 > Hmmm-- most of the links for the .pdf's don't work-- I hope just a temporary
 > glitch.

Ah, I see.  Rather fewer are accessible than I'd hoped... in fact, of
those no longer on the present site, only the one I was looking for
seems to be archived.

Well, I do have locally stored copies of two of the now-inaccessible
papers, if you'd like them. (The first is another sketch, quite
similar to the one I mentioned before - I haven't made a detailed
comparison.)

"Tagalog", Article 135 in: Booij, Gert, Christian Lehmann & Joachim
Mugdan (eds), _Morphology. A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation_,
Vol.2, Berlin: de Gruyter

"Typological overview", in: K. A. Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann,
(eds), _The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar_, London:
Routledge/Curzon Press