Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY: Question: Bound Morphemes

From:Raymond A. Brown <raybrown@...>
Date:Tuesday, July 6, 1999, 5:36
At 10:20 pm -0500 5/7/99, Nik Taylor wrote:
>"Raymond A. Brown" wrote: >> And in >> some English dialects one comes forms like /tapl/ or /Tapl/ (yes - the >> sounds are voiceless) for standard English /DI'&pl/ "the apple". > >Interesting. I remember reading an excerpt from a legal document in >Middle English containing the line "The kyng by =FEadvise and assent of >>the lordes spirituell and temporell ..." (=FE =3D thorn), but I didn't kno=
w
>if there were modern examples of that. > >Incidentally, I say /D@'?&pl=3D/
Yep - initial /t/ and/or /T/ still survive in some northern English dialects. Not living in that part of England, I don't know how much they're still used among the younger generations, but I suspect they'll continue for some while. These sounds do get modified before certain consonants. Somewhere I've got notes on this, but I can't remember where I put them :=3D( I was brought up using /DI/ before vowels, but it is not uncommon to hear /D@/ used in all contexts. The use of the glottal stop can be heard among those who say /D@/. But I think on this side of the pond, the increasingly common use of the glottal stop as an allophone of /t/ when medial or final, at least in southern England, militates against its use in other contexts. Pronunciations like /Dj&pl=3D/ are not uncommon. Ray. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D A mind which thinks at its own expense will always interfere with language. [J.G.Hamann - 1760] =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D