From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Tuesday, June 10, 2003, 10:19 |
Hi! "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> writes:> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 12:41:54AM +0200, Henrik Theiling wrote: > > if not x2 and not x3 and x1 then: > > .* > > You can have a helping dot in the upper right square? Doesn't it get > confused with the palatal dot?Hmm, I don't think so, but: this helping dot will never be used when a palatal dot appears, so overlap is not a problem. And the position of the palatal dot is slightly uneven compared to the rest of the glyph, which is detected very well by the eye. However, I experimented with using the letter 'i' for the palatalisation, because some very common words (especially the pronouns 'jo', 'je' and 'ja') look very nice then. ('ji' is not a valid compination, so it's feasible). Have you had a look at my page that I posted? Do you like it? http://www.theiling.de/projects/s2/font.html **Henrik
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |