Re: Ebisedian number system (I)
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Thursday, July 18, 2002, 0:44 |
Christian Thalmann scripsit:
> Not at all. Just call the year in which Christ was born the year
> 0 AD = 0 BC, then we'd have no problem. The year 100 BC would be
> -100 AD, and distances between the systems would be consistent.
People who actually care about this stuff relabel the BCE years by
one: 1 BCE = 0, 2 BCE = -1, 3 BCE = -2, etc. This is the convention of
ISO 8601, the standard for designating Gregorian dates and times.
(XML Schema implements this buggily, equating -1 with 1 BCE, and
leaving out 0 altogether.)
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)