Re: new parts of speech/cases
From: | Muke Tever <alrivera@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 18:41 |
From: "Jake X" <alwaysawake247@...>
> My friends and I were thinking about words that could have the same function
> as a pronoun only with verbs. For example:
>
> Mohammamed Ali converted, and others "did so."
>
> In English, I cannot think ov a word that follows that function to clone a
> previously mentioned verb. But it was theoretical.
Well, 'do' works, although your the example sentence it wants to carry 'so' (a
pro-adverb?!) or something semantically equivalent which doesn't appear to
refer
to anything stated in the--something stupid in me screams to put down
'apodosis'
here--in the original clause.
Even though it isn't always necessary to !do !so, in most cases we !do.
- I hit John with a rock.
["do" is now proverb for = "hit John with a rock"]
- You did?
[= You "hit Jon with a rock"?]
- I didn't, though I wish I did.
[= I "hit Jon with a rock"n't, though I wish I "hit John with a
rock".]
- Was he being a jerk again?
["be" = "be being a jerk".]
- Yes, he was. He always is. He should be more like Mary--she never is.
[= Yes, he 'was being a jerk'. he always 'is being a jerk'. ..
etc.]
*Muke!
--
http://www.frath.net/