Re: Optimum number of symbols
From: | Jim Grossmann <steven@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 1:38 |
Hi, Tim,
No, cuneiform writing isn't writing in clay tablets by definition; the word
refers to the use of wedge-shaped characters. Admittedly, the use of a
cornered stylus on a clay tablet would be an easy way to make the wedge
shaped.
Regardless, I never really contemplated the use of a cuneiform script. I
just thought that I could devise a mixed morphemic/alphabetic script that
would be just as esthetically pleasing. (See my original post.)
At first, I thought of doing something analogous to cuneiform by allowing a
felt tip pen to bleed a bit before I completed a linear stroke. But this
thought evaporated; why should I slow the writing process just to make the
strokes wedge-shaped, when I could just use lines? Lately, I've thought of
a script whose characters comprised perpendicular lines. That's more
restrictive than Chinese strokes, but my scheme requires far fewer
characters than a full-blown logographic script does. Still, I may have
less visual variety than I need with this scheme.
Still mulling this one over,
Jim
(Tim May wrote...)
"Wouldn't that be "the use of clay tablets as a medium for writing"?
Cuneiform's great for that, but possibly not so good for other media,
where you're drawing lines rather then imprinting them."
Reply