Re: Optimum number of symbols
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Friday, May 24, 2002, 12:23 |
Christophe Grandsire scripsit:
> True, but I also think that spelling needs to be tailored for the needs of the
> ones who make the most distinctions, because it's better for recognisability
> that distinctions are marked even when they are not made by everyone, rather
> than distinctions not to be made while many people make them.
Indeed. To take an anglophone example, it is better that some writers
must wonder "Hmm, is the word spelled |theft| or |feft|?", than that
many readers must wonder "Hmm, is this word 'lord' or 'laud'?"
It may actually be rational to recognize *more* distinctions than any
one dialect makes for this reason.
--
John Cowan <jcowan@...> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
Replies