Re: time distinctions

Jonathan Chang wrote:
>     Wish there were samples of this language ChiBemba.... be neat to see how
> it works/looks...
There is, actually (the tense marker is the second prefix):
Remote past (before yesterday): ba-àlí-bomb-ele (they worked)
Removed past (yesterday): ba-àlíí-bomba
Near past (ealier today): ba-àcí-bomba
Immediate past (just happened): ba-á-bomba
Immediate future (very soon): ba-áláá-bomba
Near future (later today): ba-léé-bomba
Removed future (tomorrow): ba-kà-bomba
Remote future (after tomorrow): ba-ká-bomba

I don't know why the remote past has an extra -ele, I suppose it's a
circumflex àlí-...-ele, but the data underlined the tense markers, and
-ele wasn't underlined.

--
"Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and
I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor