Needed: Fresh eyes for phonology
From: | Peter Clark <pc451@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 0:57 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
With all this talk regarding the most beautiful of phonologies, I thought,
"Hey, time to look at Enamyn's phonology again." It was at that point that I
realized that Enamyn is really Tolkienesque. Judge for yourself:
Plosives: /p b t d k/
Nasals: /m n/
Fricatives: /f v T s S x/
Laterals: /l K/
Trill: /r/
Approximate: /j/
Affricates: /ts tS/
Vowels: /i E a o M/ (/M/ represents unrounded /u/, and I am thinking of
de-rounding /o/ to /7/...)
Please note that I am not aiming for the most beautiful phonology. If I
were, /tS/ would be right out. (Of course, the careful reader will note that
absence of /g/ and of all voiced fricatives, save /v/ :)
I've gone over the IPA chart numerous times, and I cannot think of what
could be added, subtracted, included, whatever. Possibilities considered and
rejected: Palatization (too much like Russian), velarization (I don't hear
the distinction well enough), pharyngealization (too much like Klingon),
implosives and ejectives and clicks and retroflexes (ridiculous for the
language), etc.
I don't know. Maybe someone will see a pattern in there. Maybe not. Maybe
I'm just crying over a beer (except I don't drink beer--wine yes, beer no)
and need someone to tell me that my little language will grow up just fine.
:) Comments welcome.
:Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8oRiYevbW9GDdlVARAsH4AJ9Klz9q0/aAteR72d2SQSfVGEioDACfeVVH
WWhaCQ7gwWvoBF6c+1rXu6U=
=ajdj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Replies