Re: confession: roots
From: | Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...> |
Date: | Monday, May 7, 2001, 17:13 |
Raymond Brown wrote:
>At 11:53 am -0400 6/5/01, John Cowan wrote:
> >Raymond Brown scripsit:
[snip]
>What does one call such an affix? I have seen the terms 'circumfix' or
>'ambifix'; but as understand it, this refers to an affix which combines
>prefix and suffix, like English em/n.......en in _em-bold-en_,
>_en-light-en_ - if indeed this is a single affix and not simply two
>affixes. But I think surer examples do exist in some natlangs.
>
>But AFAIK there's no term for an affix that is partly infixed & partly
>suffixed to a root or stem like the ancient Greek -m/n...an-.
Hm, going on logic [dodging incoming vegetables], 'circumfix' would I guess
strictly refer to the "embolden" phenomenon, while 'ambifix' could refer to
any multiple-bits affix.
>
>In theory one could have an affix which is partly prefixed & partly
>infixed. Indeed, I'd be surprised if it never occurred in any natlang.
Don't some Arabic inflection patterns work that way?
Andreas
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.