Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: confession: roots

From:Raymond Brown <ray.brown@...>
Date:Monday, May 7, 2001, 6:43
At 11:53 am -0400 6/5/01, John Cowan wrote:
>Raymond Brown scripsit: > >> Affixes >> include not only prefixes & suffixes but also infixes; since in the Semitic >> langs vowels act as infixes, the root is the (usually triliteral) >> consonants, e.g. KTB (write). > >Indo-European has infixes too, though less prominently. The difference >between "confound" and "confuse" (or more accurately their Latin originals) >represents a nasal infix: the root is "fud", there is a prefix "con".
Quite right - and ancient Greek shows a strange formation for forming some durative stems from the simple root, used as the base for the aorist forms, by both infixing a nasal and adding -an-; but it seems clear that we are not dealing with an infix plus a suffix but, rather, of a single affix, e.g. e-thig-on = I touched; e-thingan-on = I was touching * e-kikh-on = I found; e-kinkhan-on = I was finding * e-lakh-on = I obtained e-lankan-on = I was obtaining by lot by lot e-lab-on = I took; e-lamban-on = I was taking e-lath-on = I lay hidden; e-lankhan-on = I was lying hidden e-math-on = I learnt; e-manthanon = I was learning e-tykh-on = I happened e-tynkhan-on = I was happening upon upon * verbs used mainly in poetry. The e- is a separate prefix, known the 'augment', which signifies past time. The aorist cannot have a present indicative tense, tho the durative can (e.g. lambano: = I am taking, I take [habitually]). What does one call such an affix? I have seen the terms 'circumfix' or 'ambifix'; but as understand it, this refers to an affix which combines prefix and suffix, like English em/n.......en in _em-bold-en_, _en-light-en_ - if indeed this is a single affix and not simply two affixes. But I think surer examples do exist in some natlangs. But AFAIK there's no term for an affix that is partly infixed & partly suffixed to a root or stem like the ancient Greek -m/n...an-. In theory one could have an affix which is partly prefixed & partly infixed. Indeed, I'd be surprised if it never occurred in any natlang. Are there agreed terms for such affixes? Ray. ========================================= A mind which thinks at its own expense will always interfere with language. [J.G. Hamann 1760] =========================================

Reply

SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY <smithma@...>