Re: confession: roots

From: "Andreas Johansson" <and_yo@...>
> We should perhaps add that the word root is often used for things that once
> worked like Oskar describes, but nowadays is only recognized as such by
> diachronic linguistics. For example, PIEists (/pai.ists/!) will tell you
> that 'guest' and 'hostile' is derived from the same PIE root (*ghost-
> "foreign" I think), but the average modern English-speaker certainly feels
> the two words to be completely unrelated.
And there are even closer cases than that that generally go unnoticed, such as
English 'to bear (a child)' / 'to be born'...

And there's a question for the list, which I forgot if I've asked already.  Is
there a simple active verb in English meaning 'to be born' ?  I have been,
lately, [in interlinears] using <nate> which is a probably-ill-formed borrowing
from Lat. <nasci> [and parallel to <cognate>, <natal>, <native>, etc., to bring
back to the topic of the post...] but has the advantage of being short...


     *Muke!

Reply