Re: a 12th century conlang
From: | charles <catty@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, March 24, 1999, 19:49 |
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Bryan Maloney wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, dunn patrick w wrote:
>
> > Why defend your favorite method by putting down someone who attacks it?
>
> Because, sometimes, some people say things too dang stupid to allow to
> fly unchallenged.
>
> > And if you say you weren't putting down someone who attacked it, you're a
> > liar, because "liar" is an insult.
>
> Never claimed not to have done so--it got your attention, didn't it?
Time to translate "plonk" into my conlang ...
In other words, that just lost my attention.