Re: a 12th century conlang
From: | dunn patrick w <tb0pwd1@...> |
Date: | Thursday, March 25, 1999, 21:13 |
On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Irina Rempt wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Sally Caves wrote:
>
> > I already described my encounter with novelist Brenda Clough
> > who expressed a similar distaste for this kind of passion. She didn't
> > think it was practical.
>
> Of course it isn't practical. That's what it's *for*. People who want
> to make a language *and* do something practical are on auxlang.
>
> Irina
Practical? Bah. My students ask me all the time, "What will we ever
*use* this for? This is boring! This is pointless!" and I always say,
"You're not here to be entertained, and if you wanted to learn something
practical, you should have gone to a technical school."
--Patrick