Re: Untouchables [Andreas J., please read]
From: | Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> |
Date: | Thursday, December 4, 2003, 15:02 |
Quoting Tristan McLeay <zsau@...>:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andreas Johansson wrote:
>
> > Quoting Tristan McLeay <zsau@...>:
> >
> > > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andreas Johansson wrote:
> > >
> > > > Quoting Robert Wilson <han_solo55@...>:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 20:46:31 +0100 Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
> > > > > writes:
> > > > > > Quoting Roger Mills <romilly@...>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > You will write (as I'm doing now) 100 times:
> > > > > > > "I will not make up fictitious website names." :-)))))))
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You asked for it. To the rest of CONLANG: My apologies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will not make up fictitious website names.
> > > > > > I will not make up fictitious website names.
> > > > > ...
> > > > >
> ...
> > > >
> > > > You _really_ believe I wrote all that by hand?
> > >
> > > You didn't? 200 lines, on paper then:
> > > I will not cheat when doing punishments.
> > > Legible handwriting is a must; I'll be the judge of that. You may scan
> it,
> > > but if there's any doubt of the authenticity, you may be asked to send
> the
> > > pages to me by snail mail, so don't throw them out.
> >
> > Actually, nothing in Roger's post said I had to do it by hand. :P
>
> No, but he said to *write* it 100 times. Copying and pasting or having a
> script do it for you is not writing. You've shown you can't be trusted to
> do it on a computer, so you're going to have to do it by hand.
Let's get into a technical discussion of the exact meaning of "to write",
shall we? Or possible ways to cheat with pen and paper?
Andreas
Reply