Re: Back!
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 19, 1999, 7:28 |
Adam Parrish wrote:
> I'm curious as to how other conlangers have solved the problem
> of cosmic location, since it does seem to be rather vital to an
> important part of a language's vocabulary.
For me, I chose Alpha Centauri A for several reasons. One, I knew the
relative masses of the suns, and their orbital period around each other
(80.09 Earth years), and other data; 2, Alpha Centauri A is very similar
to our sun (1.08 solar masses, just a little warmer, 30% brighter), and
3, it gave me an excuse to place humans there without conquest. I
wanted to place humans on the same world, but without having conquest.
My problem was, if they were non-conquering people, why would they
settle on an already-inhabited world? So, I decided that when the
colonists headed to Alpha Cen, they didn't know that it was inhabited.
The probe that had brought back data malfunctioned. The high-resolution
cameras were non-functioning. Enough data came back to see that the
world was habitable, that it had life on it, but not enough data came
back to detect the influences of a low-tech society. Fortunately, there
were a number of uninhabited islands.
> I'm not satisfied with either of these
> options. Have I missed anything? Is there a middle ground?
Well, you could always put it on our world in the past, or in the
present, in some remote location [as I believe the inventor of Jakutdok
(sp?) has done]. Or, you could place it in the future. But other than
our world, parallel Earth, or other world, I see no other possibility.
--
"[H]e axed after eggys: And the goode wyf answerde, that she coude not
speke no Frenshe ... And then at last a nother sayd that he woulde haue
hadde eyren: then the goode wyf sayd that she vnderstood hym wel." --
William Caxton
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Conlang/W.html
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor