Re: Verb order in Montreiano
| From: | Frank George Valoczy <valoczy@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, April 2, 2001, 21:30 |
|---|
>
> Interesting. Do you give yourself a few "sample words" to start with
> (before doing core vocab) to work with morphology? I find it easier to
> "see" what's going on with even morphology *I've* invented when it's
> applied to an actual word, but that may be a peculiarity of my brain. :-)
I'm the same way, so either it's normal, or we're related ;) But then I've
heard tell that Korean and Hungarian may be distantly related...
>
> Vocab is probably my favourite part of conlanging. <embarrassed look>
>
As soon as I read that I grimaced...that's the part I dislike most. For
every one conlang for which I've come out with vocab, there's a dozen
different ones for which I've only done grammar, and for each one
Grammar-Only-Lang there's a dozen for which I've only worked out
phonology...that's my favourite part. Phonology, especially historical...
-------ferko
Ferenc Gy. Valoczy
Suurt chugunikka peene ahjo suhe et toukka.
Virtual Votia - Vaddjamaa Internetaza: http://www.geocities.com/uralica
railways page: http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/3976/
25kV 50Hz: http://www.mp3.com/25kV50Hz
Reply