Re: Introduction to FourHorse
From: | Danny Wier <dawier@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, June 20, 2001, 6:12 |
From: "Shreyas Sampat" <nsampat@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: Introduction to FourHorse
| Voiced whistles. It's interesting you should mention those; I was just
| having a discussion about them yesterday. They're interesting little
| noises. Maybe I'll do one of those freaky conlangs we've been talking about
| with a whole whistle series (though for the life if me I cannot pronounce a
| velar whistle, and the closest to a palatal I can get is a hiss), though I
| don't know how one would romanize that, and I'm a stickler for nice
| orthography.
I never really learned how to whistle at all until recently. I first learned to
whistle using the interdental (fricative) articulation, sending air through the
gap in my top front teeth. That's an "upper register" whistle, and sometimes I
can hit notes as high as the G above the high C on a standard 88-key piano or a
piccolo (approximately 6400 Hz).
What is a velar whistle anyway? I can do the palatal and lateral "hisses".
| A trill series would be interesting too, and lovely voiceless nasals. For a
| speciel with really limber tongues, perhaps. Just trills and whistles and
| fricatives. None of that stop crap. (I once tried replacing all the stops
| in a short Nrit text with their corresponding fricatives; the result was
| rather interesting.)
My conlang has voiceless nasals and voiceless trills, but the trills are all of
the rhotic type, either alveolar or retroflex/palatal. (The latter has
fricative properties like Czech r-caron.) Unless you want to account the voiced
uvular fricative and the retroflex semivowel as two additional r's...
~DaW~
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Replies