Re: Sawilan Constructions
| From: | Boudewijn Rempt <bsarempt@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, August 10, 1999, 15:32 |
|---|
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, John Cowan wrote:
> Ed Heil wrote:
>
> > Or wait till I go back to school and become a *real* linguist
> > someday, and see whether in the process I realize that Cog. Gram. is
> > just a notational variant (since I've already read FOCG; that would
> > save you the trouble).
>
> Of course! All competing theories are 1) just a notational
> variant of your own, and 2) wrong.
>
That means that all theories are wrong, including ones own - and I
think I can readily agree with that proposition ;-). After all, it's
a well-known fact that a language cannot be described...
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.xs4all.nl/~bsarempt