Re: Slovanik, Enamyn, and Slavic slaves
From: | Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, August 7, 2002, 17:00 |
Quoting Christopher Wright <faceloran@...>:
> Jan van Steenbergen sekalge:
> >--- Peter Clark wrote:
> > > Although a case could also be made for "slava," fame, glory.
> > > That's one theory, too. But somehow, I can't tell why, I don't believe
> > > it.
>
> What nation would call itself Glorious, you mean? By their history, do
> they seem like a tribe of megalomaniacs?
If every nation or ethnic group that deemed "glory" as an inherent
quality of itself were condemned as megalomaniacs, there wouldn't
be enough insane-asylums for them all. (Of course, you might have
a point if you consider nonstandard insane asylyms like, say, the
planet Earth.)
=========================================================================
Thomas Wier
Dept. of Linguistics "Nihil magis praestandum est quam ne pecorum ritu
University of Chicago sequamur antecedentium gregem, pergentes non qua
1010 E. 59th Street eundum est, sed qua itur." -- Seneca
Chicago, IL 60637
Reply