Re: Meghean writing
From: | <morphemeaddict@...> |
Date: | Saturday, April 21, 2007, 18:08 |
In a message dated 4/21/2007 12:49:53 PM Central Daylight Time, andjo@FREE.FR
writes:
> > Being a big fan of Meghean, I would have expected something more
> > aesthetic (sorry!)... maybe these runes are made for carving,
> > and there's a cursive version for painting?
>
> Runes? I'd think the shapes rather too curvy to be much good for carving.
>
> The shapes you see in that gif do have a certain angularity owing to my
> imperfect computer graphics skills; they do look more cursive when I draw
> them
> by hand (you may note each can be drawn without lifting your pen). I should
> be
> able to give them a softer look in the gif, but when I made it I was more
> concerned with getting the basic shapes across than the aesthetics.
>
> Andreas
>
They look a lot like Georgian.
stevo </HTML>
Reply