>Tim May wrote at 2005-08-30 22:10:19 (+0100)
>
> >
> > If it were working (which unfortunately at present it seems not to be)
> > you might like to try Maciej Ceg³owski's language guesser too,
> > although it's supposed to identify stuff it doesn't know as
> > "gibberish", so you're not guaranteed an amusing misidentification.
> >
> >
http://languid.cantbedone.org/
>
>Languid is working again now, so those who found the exercise with the
>Xerox guesser interesting might like to try it out.
From the point of view of the original aims of the language guesser, it's
quite clever that it avoids false identifications. But it's quite
demoralising to see your conlang described as "gibberish".
Pete