Re: Concept_sitting
From: | Erbrice <erbrice@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 22:50 |
right, fair point.
may be there is no way to be paradoxal in semantic.
Le 19 janv. 09 à 22:29, Mark J. Reed a écrit :
> Fair point. But, as you said, a nit - it clarifies some detail
> without changing the nature of the situation.
>
>
>
> On 1/19/09, Paul Kershaw <ptkershaw@...> wrote:
>>> (Proponents of those theories would simply say that no speaker would
>>> ever "naturally emit" a sentence like "This sentence is false",
>>> so it
>>> doesn't count.)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark J. Reed
>>
>> Nit: I can easily imagine scenarios in which a native English
>> speaker would
>> naturally produce the sentence "This sentence is false," but "this
>> sentence"
>> wouldn't be self-referential, and hence the sentence wouldn't be
>> paradoxical
>> (e.g., someone's reading a news article aloud and pauses after a
>> sentence to
>> proclaim it false).
>>
>> -- Paul
>>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
>
> Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>