Re: Conlanging and Natlangs
From: | Jim Grossmann <steven@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, July 18, 2000, 4:12 |
Hi, Eli,
You've made point that forces me to change some of my claims. I should be
embarassed, in fact. My own Goesk is based on languages that have evolved
spontaneously. Still, this doesn't change these facts: most languages
evolve spontaneously and invented languages undergo unplanned changes after
a sufficiently large population uses them for daily spoken communication.
Those are the points that I needed to emphasize. As for Hebrew, I will
leave it to philosophers to debate whether Ben Yehuda's language qualified
as a pidgin when it started out.
Jim
> Brithenig is based entirely on languages which spontaneously evolved, but
> I don't think anyone would argue that it is not a conlang, if a conlang of
> a specialized sort.
>
> ___
> )_|_) Eli Naeher - enaeher@emma.troy.ny.us
> )__|__)
> )___|___) "A whaleship was my Yale College and my Harvard."
> \-,__|_,---/ --Herman Melville
> \________/