Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Are conlangs fictional?

From:Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Date:Friday, March 22, 2002, 8:15
En réponse à Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...>:

> > > My opinion is that they're obviously not, whereas > > others have argued eloquently and at length that > > they are. What's the consensus on Conlang? > > How much more fictional could they actually be? >
You see? Confusion on terms. What do you mean in this case by "fictional"? And to give some comparisons: what would be a fictional painting, other than a painting referred to in a story, but which doesn't exist in reality? But if the author paints a painting in real life, and then uses it in a story, does it make suddenly the painting fictional? I guess not, since the painting is here in real life and can be seen outside the context of the fiction it's used in. It's the same with Tolkien's languages. They exist outside the context of Tolkien's stories, which means that they cannot be fictional in the common sense of the word. Well, I guess this explanation is even better than my lengthier one :)) . It seems that people are giving two different meanings to the word "fictional": "used in the context of a fiction (which doesn't mean it cannot exist outside of this context)" or "existing only in the context of a fiction (meaning that apart from what we learn of it in the fiction, there's nothing else)", and argue because they take different meanings as primary. Let's take another example: The Necronomicon, this "unholy" book used in H.P. Lovecraft's stories, was definitely fictional: apart from a few quotes that we can see in his stories, there is nothing else, and we can be nearly sure that he never wrote this book himself. Still, IIRC a book called the Necronomicon and based on the little evidence we get from Lovecraft's stories has later been written. This Necronomicon is *not* fictional. Anyone can have it in his/her hands, it's an object of the real world (whatever reality is :)) ). Whether this Necronomicon has anything to do with the fictional Necronomicon of Lovecraft's stories, we cannot know, since Lovecraft was already dead when this book was made. I hope the difference between the two meanings of the word "fictional" as used around here is clear now :)) . Christophe. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.

Replies

Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...>
Matthew Kehrt <matrix14@...>