Re: The pitfall of Chinese/Mandarin
From: | Kala Tunu <kalatunu@...> |
Date: | Saturday, December 8, 2001, 10:45 |
Dan Jones <dan@...> wrote:
Cheng Zhong Su escreva:
<snip incoherence>
>Or we may say every language has to
>contribute the so called international language some
>thing, step by step. The target may be 1, learning
>less knowing more. 2, having the fast thinking speed.
>3. the best copy for all cultures.
Okay- that's too far. No blatant auxlanging on this list.
Did you read and
understand the welcome message when you joined? I'm not
going to answer
these faintly ludicrous points- if I wanted to do that I'd
be on Auxlang.
Take the hint.
Dan Jones
"""""""""""""""""""""""""
anyway, there IS already a perfect auxlang. it's Esperanto.
i mean Interlingua. or Glosa. or whatever. but for sure
there IS already one, so it's no need to argue anymore. the
next step is to force mankind to learn Esperanto. i mean
Interlingua. or Glosa. or whatever. btw, do y'all know that
French is the auxlang with the biggest number of native
speakers and one of the best soccer teams in the world?
impressive, uh?
Mathias
www.geocities.com/kalatunu/index.htm
Reply