Re: ANADEWISM? Plural only marked in animates
From: | Thomas Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Thursday, May 5, 2005, 16:05 |
Benct wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is an ANADEWISM for marking
> plurality only in animates?
In Georgian, the tendency is to mark plurality only on
animates, or even only on human beings. So, the word for
"goat" is _txa_, but the normal way to point to a bunch
of goats is not _txebi_, but just _txa_. Of course,
after quantifiers only the singular form is licit.
=========================================================================
Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally,
Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right
University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of
1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter.
Chicago, IL 60637