Re: +AFs-CONLANG+AF0- Vowel romanization

Herman Miller wrote:

>And Rosta wrote:
>
>
>
>>Your romanization options seem to go beyond what I would think of as a
>>romanization, in that they use nonalphabetical characters. So I can't
>>quite grasp the rationale or the problem: if you can go outside the roman
>>alphabet, surely there is a great array of symbols available for use?
>>If you have to stick with roman letters, then you'd have to fall back on
>>diacritics and digraphs.
>>
>>
>
>The "open e" and "open o" are used in some African languages. The
>letters with dots under them are used in Vietnamese (but not for the
>same sounds -- the Vietnamese dot is a tone mark). The Cyrillic z for an
>open-mid central vowel is an arbitrary substitution for a reversed open
>e, but Zhuang uses it for a tone letter, which doesn't have anything to
>do with its actual use in the Cyrillic alphabet. The main thing I want
>to avoid are letters that don't have upper and lower case versions.
>Limitations of font technology in Windows put restrictions on which
>capital letters can have diacritics added to them. Some Greek letters
>could potentially be of use, but the problem with Greek vowel letters is
>that their upper case forms look like Latin letters. But I'd like to
>stick with the Roman alphabet or extra letters that are traditionally
>used with the Roman alphabet, rather than borrowing arbitrary characters
>from other scripts. I've only considered the Cyrillic z because it looks
>like the IPA character [3], and I haven't come up with a better
>representation for that sound.
>
>
>
>

Indeed.  And, if his argument is correct, English doesn't use the roman
alphabet - w?  j? u?

Svrely, vve shovld all vvrite like this.  That vvay vve vvovld be
staying vvithin the bovnds of the roman alphabet as vsed by Ivlivs Caesar.

Replies