From: | Joe <joe@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Sunday, February 22, 2004, 12:33 |
Tristan McLeay wrote:>On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Ray Brown wrote: > > > >>In fact, the dual alphabet system is an odd aberration, found only, I >>believe, in the modern Roman, Greek & Cyrillic systems. Older alphabets >>knew of no such system and, till the present day, the Hebrew & Arabic >>alphabets have no such dual systems, nor do the abugidas of India & >>Ethiopia, nor the Korean hangul alphabet nor, AFAIK any other alphabet, >>abjad or abugida. >> >> > >doesn't or didn't the georgian alphabet do it? (i know there are three, >and I thought two are or were used together as uppercase and lowercase, no >doubt influenced by the roman alphabet?) (AND HOW DID THE ROMANS SHOVT IN >TEXT IF THIS IS NORMAL? :) (j/k) > > >Indeed. Don't forget Japanese - though, obviously, they don't use them as capital and lower case, they still have a dual(or even trial, counting kanji) writing system.
Muke Tever <hotblack@...> | Vowel romanization |