Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Triggeriness ...

From:Barry Garcia <barry_garcia@...>
Date:Saturday, December 13, 2003, 4:21
Constructed Languages List <CONLANG@...> writes:
>No, but you belong to the same category.
Yes, but we're *not* the same thing, which is what you suggest when saying "why not call them cases?"
> > >> If you want to be liberal, we can say all languages have case. However >i'm >> speaking of explicit case, not implied. > >That was not clear. Still, the Tagalog trigger does look like an explicit >case >marker.
It's pretty clear to me: Explicit - obvious, implied - not obvious. What "case" is the marker then? I see a difference between something that marks which word is emphasized and one that tells you the role of the word in relation to others.
> > > >Terminology seems to've changed during this discussion; "trigger" used to >refer to the marker indicating the focused noun. If you are now refering >the >the verbal markers telling us what function the focused nouns has, that's >indeed not case markers. I'd follow Javier's lead and say they're a kind >of >voice markers.
I still do not see the trigger markers as case markers, because they *do not* have any other role than to indicate where emphasis of the verb is.
> > > >Actually, case affixes indicate how the noun arguments relate to the >_verb_ >(how else could you have case affixes in intransitive sentences without >oblique arguments?).
OK. But they also indicate relation to each other, right? If not, then you may want to update the fine folks on the linguistics mailing list.
> > >I can imagine a noun having a trigger marker, or not having a trigger >marker, >but _neither_? I would not believe that when I saw it with my own eyes!
Neither = prepositions.
> >I think you should update your understanding of "case".
OK then Andreas, since you'be been rallying so hard to convince me that it is case, then explain in *simple terms* as best you can what case is *exactly*. Keep the terminology simple, keep it plain.
> > >Again, I don't know Tagalog, but from the descriptions and examples by >you and >others in this thread, it looks like a lang that's grammaticalized >emphasis, >and uses case marking to indicate it.
And to me it has gramaticalized emphasis and uses markers to indicate which word is the focus or which is not. __________________________ I've got love and anger they come as a pair You can take your chances but buyer beware

Replies

Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
Tim May <butsuri@...>